| By Diane Mueller | Article Rating: |
|
| June 19, 2009 02:00 PM EDT | Reads: |
3,044 |
The key to the success of this plan is to ensure that there is some agreement across all federal agencies that defines a shared common ‘open' data standard and identifies how deeply they are willing to push the tagging of data gathered into the collection processes for Recovery Act funding applications and into the financial reporting between the federal, state, and local agencies who are to be the recipients of the Recovery Act funds. Currently, the plan is to only go one level deep - the federal agency will require recipient reporting only from the primary agency receiving the funds.
For instance, a grant could be given from the Federal government to State A, which then gives a sub grant to City B (within State A), which hires a contractor to construct a bridge, which then hires a subcontractor to supply the concrete. In this case, State A is the prime recipient and would be required to report the sub grant to City B. However, City B does not have any specific reporting obligations - nor does the contractor or subcontractor - for the purposes of reporting to the Recovery.gov website.
In Spain, XBRL has been used right down to the municipal level for the reporting and monitoring of Local Government Budget Reporting; there's no reason not to encourage all levels of government agencies to increase information sharing.
Kundra's Potential Impact on XBRL
Kundra could really drive XBRL forward by insisting that all the data, right down to actual recipients, be made available as long as that data did not breach privacy and security of individuals. As accounting packages and ERP vendors like SAP are all adding XBRL export functionality to their offerings to facilitate SEC filings, it would be a natural next step to get XBRL-tagged reports all the way down to the contractor and sub-contractor levels.
Obama's team should really take a close look at the Dutch and Australian efforts to breakdown the governmental information silos with their move to a Standard Business Reporting (SBR) approach. The Dutch and Australian governments recognized the interdependent nature of government agencies and the increased need for information-sharing via a standards-based approach and are relying heavily on the XBRL standard in their eGov efforts to give their countries an extra edge of efficiency.
Kundra should court developers by providing an open standards-based, open source tool chain, giving examples and explaining in clear language how to create applications in the same manner that Apple and Facebook have done. If built on the solid open data standard foundation laid by U.S. SEC and the XBRL consortium, this should ensure - as long as data is free and open - that applications will flourish and shine some long-awaited sunlight on government spending.
Empower the world's developers to make the Recover.gov data more useful and understandable for users rather than creating reliance on Federal government contractors to develop more websites for displaying data. Developers everywhere are eager to create meaningful applications that will connect users to financial data and solve real-world problems. Free the data, and the application developers will follow.
Published June 19, 2009 Reads 3,044
Copyright © 2009 SYS-CON Media, Inc. — All Rights Reserved.
Syndicated stories and blog feeds, all rights reserved by the author.
More Stories By Diane Mueller
Diane Mueller has been actively involved in the development efforts of the XBRL standard for the past nine years. She is the Canadian representative to the XBRL International Steering Committee, serves as Vice Chair of that body, and chairs the XBRL Working Groups on Rendering and Software Interoperability. She currently serves as vice president of XBRL development at JustSystems, the largest independent software vendor in Japan and a worldwide leader in XML and information management technologies. Learn more about JustSystems at http://www.justsystems.com, and contact Diane at diane@justsystems.com.
- Tactical Cloud Computing Panel at 1st Annual GovIT Expo
- The End of IT 1.0 As We Know It Has Begun
- Why SOA Needs Cloud Computing - Part 1
- Cloud Expo and The End of Tech Recession
- The Transition to Cloud Computing: What Does It Mean For You?
- Reality Check at the Cloud Computing Expo
- Virtualization Expo Call for Papers Deadline December 15
- A Security Analysis of Cloud Computing
- IBM Sitting Pretty on Oracle-Sun Debacle
- Ecosystem is the Killer App for Cloud Computing
- The Cloud Has Cross-Border Ambitions
- Qt DevDays 2009 - Munich
- The Difference Between Web Hosting and Cloud Computing
- GovIT Expo Highlights Cloud Computing
- Cloud Computing Best Practices
- Tactical Cloud Computing Panel at 1st Annual GovIT Expo
- The End of IT 1.0 As We Know It Has Begun
- Why SOA Needs Cloud Computing - Part 1
- Cloud Expo and The End of Tech Recession
- The Transition to Cloud Computing: What Does It Mean For You?
- Reality Check at the Cloud Computing Expo
- Build Reliability into Cloud Computing for SMBs
- Perhaps SOA is More Strategy Than Architecture
- Five Reasons to Choose a Private Cloud
- Virtualization Conference Keynote Webcast Live on SYS-CON.TV
- Red Hat Drops Consumer Linux, Sponsors Community Led Fedora Project
- Citrix & Dell Partner on Server Virtualization
- The Top 250 Players in the Cloud Computing Ecosystem
- Red Hat CTO Keynoting Today on The Future of the Virtual Enterprise
- Red Hat Named "Platinum Sponsor" of Virtualization Conference & Expo
- Red Hat vs Sun Battle of Words Heats Up
- Forbes' "Red Hat = Linux" Spin Angers Sun Microsystems COO
- SOA, Virtualization and Web 2.0: BEA's Deputy CTO Connects the Dots
- Getting Started with Red Hat Linux
- Red Hat to Deploy "NX" vs Viruses
- Red Hat to Compete Against SourceLabs and SpikeSource
































