Welcome!

Red Hat Authors: Pat Romanski, Don MacVittie, Dan Joe Barry, Ray DePena, Yeshim Deniz

Related Topics: Red Hat, Linux

Red Hat: Article

Red Hat May Have Difficulty Trademarking "Fedora" Name

Red Hat May Have Difficulty Trademarking "Fedora" Name

In September if this year, Red Hat applied to the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office for a trademark - to cover its use of "Fedora" in operating systems and related goods and services.

As the New York Times pointed out yesterday, "Red Hat's Fedora Project site already treats the name as a trademark and cites legal guidelines for using the term."

Here is what the site says:

The Fedora Name

Fedora is now a trademark of Red Hat, Inc. Red Hat will defend this trademark in order to protect the integrity of The Fedora Project. The rules for using the Fedora trademark will be generally more permissive than the rules for using the Red Hat trademarks. The separate name and trademark are necessary in order to have different rules for using the trademarks. The rules for using the "Fedora" trademark are available at http://fedora.redhat.com/about/trademarks/.

Red Hat's official "Red Hat" has been the Red Hat Fedora made by the New York Hat Company for many years.

The problem is that as long ago as 1997 computer scientists at Cornell University began working on a project to build a software tool, mainly for the benefit of librarians, that would blend content from various internal and external sources and present them in a unified form.

The New York Times quotes Carl Lagoze, a senior researcher in Cornell's information sciences department, as explaining that the project was named "FEDORA" because it was an acronym for Flexible Extensible Digital Object Repository Architecture."

"We're a research project; we never had any active interest in grabbing the name," Lagoze said. But apparently that may be about to change, says the Times.

More Stories By Red Hat News Desk

Red Hat News Desk trawls the world's news information sources and brings you timely updates on its flagship Red Hat Enterprise Linux as well as the company's other product lines including database, content, and collaboration management applications; server and embedded operating systems; and software - including its most recent virtualization offerings.

Comments (5) View Comments

Share your thoughts on this story.

Add your comment
You must be signed in to add a comment. Sign-in | Register

In accordance with our Comment Policy, we encourage comments that are on topic, relevant and to-the-point. We will remove comments that include profanity, personal attacks, racial slurs, threats of violence, or other inappropriate material that violates our Terms and Conditions, and will block users who make repeated violations. We ask all readers to expect diversity of opinion and to treat one another with dignity and respect.


Most Recent Comments
Randall Poznan 11/25/03 03:06:22 PM EST

Can Fedora. My vote is for "Trucker CAP Linux"

Randall Poznan 11/25/03 02:56:25 PM EST

Redhat should lose the whole FEDORA image, it signifies their corporate enterprise linux business. My suggestion for a replacement community name is: "GNU TRUCKER CAP Linux". This name would be more than appropriate, for a linux community edition.

rico giove 11/25/03 01:44:18 PM EST

At least we have fedora, instead of being locked out completely......

Paul Gray 11/25/03 11:12:09 AM EST

Allt the feedback anyone could want on this topic is available at slashdot.com
That said, Cornell and virginia know full well that Red Hat can lay no claim against prior use, the also know full well that anyone else can claim the use of a non registered name in the market, and can claim the same name in different markets. FEDORA is making an obvious attempt at extortion. It might have worked, had Red Hat Fedora been a front line product instead of a community based development/testbed project.

Brian Clancey 11/24/03 06:51:59 PM EST

I fully support the idea that Cornell University block Red Hat's effort to trademark "Fedora" -- a common word. All too often, for profit companies commandeer words and phrases used by smaller groups and then put the legal blocks to them. It is about time, big companies started getting some come uppance.