Server Monitoring Authors: Yeshim Deniz, Liz McMillan, Pat Romanski, Carmen Gonzalez, Ken Schwaber

Related Topics: Server Monitoring

Server Monitoring: Article

Red Hat Is "Growing Up"

Will loyal users be left looking elsewhere?

Today’s confirmation from the Red Hat Network that support for Red Hat 7.x and 8.0 is ending in December 2003 and that Red Hat 9.0 support will end in April, 2004, has all the trappings of a company that is growing up and growing out of its freely downloadable history. I sadly mark it as an end of an era - and yet another sign of the OSS movement moving toward the enterprise and maturing as it goes.

As a Red Hat user since 1995, I know there are simply too many people in my boat for us to go without great alternatives going forward. Perhaps these will come from within Red Hat, but if not, certainly outside Red Hat there will continue to be a lot to choose from as distribution vendors race to fill a void and provide migration plans. Having used Debian at home a lot, I know that picking any well-known Linux distro is going to be a safe bet for folks running basic Internet and database servers like myself.

Red Hat is pointing users interested in free downloads to the Fedora project - which Red Hat sponsors - but I can tell you I will not be using it. I used Red Hat all these years and even occasionally bought their boxed set (not because I needed it but because I owed it to them), because it was a viable and stable product. Fedora is a nice idea but Red Hat does not support it and makes no claim to it being stable or production-ready. Fedora is an experiment and, really, an answer from Red Hat of how to provide something like the old Red Hat Linux without cutting into their Enterprise business. So, down go support, stability, and production-quality values and in it’s place is experimentation – it’s a marketing move in the purest sense.

I run co-lo servers for various clients and I provide system administration to other servers that I do not have direct responsibility for. The focus for me now is to determine, for the first time since 1995, what my migration path is going to be during the coming year. I have always liked Debian’s apt system but their install process, particularly for configuring X, has not been a favorite. I’m interested in seeing how this affects Mandrake but that’s probably not a distro I would look at really closely. FreeBSD will get another close look and I will look at Gentoo to see if I should look more closely at it. I’ll also have my eyes and ears open, not for the ensuing distro wars but for good information on migration options in general. I know I won’t have problems.

As the Red Hats of the world continue to sharpen their organizations toward the enterprise target, perhaps the low-end of the market – the ISP and the independent –  will be left a little high and dry. That’s OK, we have other alternatives. . .but it’s looking less and less as if one of them will be Red Hat.

More Stories By Paul Nowak

Paul Nowak first used Linux in 1995 while migrating from Sun to Linux at the University of Michigan. He used Linux in subsequent IT projects including web, telecom, telemetry and embedded projects and is currently CIO of a small professional association based in Washington D.C.

Comments (36) View Comments

Share your thoughts on this story.

Add your comment
You must be signed in to add a comment. Sign-in | Register

In accordance with our Comment Policy, we encourage comments that are on topic, relevant and to-the-point. We will remove comments that include profanity, personal attacks, racial slurs, threats of violence, or other inappropriate material that violates our Terms and Conditions, and will block users who make repeated violations. We ask all readers to expect diversity of opinion and to treat one another with dignity and respect.

Most Recent Comments
Dilbert Dobbs 11/27/03 04:10:28 AM EST

Unless there are corporate sponsors of open source that are bank rolling development (like IBM does a lot of stuff so as to do to Microsoft what Microsoft did to Netscape) there's just not much of a money making proposition to it. Red Hat just keeps retreating by moving the line back further and further as they see their various business scenarios just don't pan out.

When I buy software I don't really see it as a payment for expected support to come (I very very seldom need any). I see it as being a way to enable a software producer to fund the R&D it took to develop software, etc, and stay in business over the long term. In the case of Linux distributions, that usually means device drivers, installers, and QA of newly assimilated code.

But consumers will never voluntarily compensate companies for such service if they can otherwise come by the hard work of the company for free. And what they actually will pay for is certainly not enough to achieve reasonable profitability for long term business viability. Even when a product is being sold at a premium it can still saturate market potential. Software getting into the hands of consumers for free or at very minimal cost (because of every copy paid for there's a zillion free installs) will simply bring on market potential saturation that much more quickly. So due to this lack-of-profitability quagmire, most open source is fated to be developed more under the umbrella of a charity foundation propped up by a corporate sugar daddy, than as any kind of genuine commercial business operation.

For all the suckers out there that have poured their talents into creating open source, well, it's a hell of a lot better to get financially rewarded than it is to become popularly known amongst an international audience of tech groupies. In the mania leading up to 2000, some did get lucky with timing and made a few bucks with options at that height of the mania. But the bubble is long over. Now all that's left is the charitable foundation model of open source development. In open source there are a few stars that perhaps make a few bucks but most players that go down that path end up in bottom feeder status making crumbs.

Richard Stallman is the greatest delusional political fanatic that's ever blighted the software scene. What a Don Quixote that guy is! Guess he'll go down in history as the American version of Karl Marx (similarly espousing a pseudo intellectual theory of social-economics that is likewise fatally flawed). Or perhaps even more apt - he'll become known as the embodiement of the America version of the Pied Piper folk tale.

Fun 11/18/03 01:57:32 PM EST

Business still business. Business can be success and failure. For my personel, I will not guest what RH will become success/failure. I think they can do better and everyone will happy but they haven't. Anyway the event is happened and become history. Such as someone say "life is fun and happy and no angry". What RH think? What RH really want to do? I will not pay attention to because it is RH's own business. If RH do good, RH will success. Otherwise, RH will face to fail. As a users, I hope RH can success. Just let the time to prove the result. Anyway, let it go. I just downlad fodera core version and playing now.

Pat 11/18/03 01:02:47 PM EST

Red hat clearly was seen by most non-Linux users as the defacto standard. Red hats strength was not its product it was it’s market share. Lets face it computer users are herd animals “if my neighbor has it, it’s good enough for me”! They will clumsily follow the idiot in front of them purchasing or downloading the product that they have heard of instead of doing the research to find the best product. So, today’s windows users could have been tomorrows Red hat users. Today’s Free Red hat users would have been tomorrow’s enterprise users. Red hat has discounted this phenomenon and dumped the proverbial hook. If the heard starts to purchase SuSE now and becomes familiar with the company and the product what enterprise version do you think they will buy? Clearly they will stick with what they know, SuSE! Red hat has clearly cut their nose off to spite their face. It is such a short-term strategy based solely on the profit and loss statement that they clearly let the accounting department create their business plan.(big mistake). Hell if the desktop wasn’t making them any money stop giving it away and start charging $10.00 per download. That wouldn’t have slowed me down and I would still be a happy user, (following the rest of the herd). And before you say anything I wouldn’t give away support for that ten dollars just a down load service fee! Despite popular myth, they can charge for that service they just need to give you the source code after you pay for it. Red hats strength wasn’t that they were the best but that they were perceived as being the most popular (so clearly they must be good enough for me). Unless Red hat takes a step back and re-evaluates their position I believe they will slowly start to loose market share. Once they start to loose market share forget it, its all over they will never recover. No one wants to hop back onto a sinking ship.

Sea Dragon 11/16/03 12:43:52 PM EST

Well, there are many users have difference expectation. Some want fast growth and some not. Some want update version and some want stable. Well, it is not easy to maintain.

But we have the choice to choose.

John 11/16/03 11:39:49 AM EST

I have been using Redhat 7.3 and 7.2 for over 2 years. My computing experience for my company is more stable than ever.
I don,t need to upgrade beyond this for a while. Redhat has given so much to the open source, lets hope they thrive in the enterprize like they did with there box products.

1MidniteRider 11/14/03 04:35:34 AM EST

There were many complaints that the RHL distros were "outdated" when compared to other Linux distros. Now as mentioned on other posts there is the "Fedora Project" to provide the "bleeding edge" technologies and there are still complaints. Could this move by RedHat have been avoided IF everyone or nearly everyone that used RHL in a production environment actually paid for the product and its support? Could it be that we as Linux community forced RedHat's hand by not financially supporting this distro? A good while back SuSE chose not to make their branded, marketed distro freely available via download. A company must make money to stay in business or close its doors. Look at what happened to Mandrake.

joao 11/09/03 07:47:36 PM EST

The RH line of evolution was traced and this “news” is more a consequence than a really news event. The 90’s GNU Open Source spirit times are now difficult to find in the GNU/Linux World apart of Debian (stubborn but faithful). I hope more BSD* users won’t take these 3 projects (Net, Open & Free) ending like SuSE, RH and the main base of Linux distributions …


bill 11/09/03 02:28:53 PM EST

LordMorgul -- To say "...you simply have to move to RHEL now" is precicely the problem I have with the way RH is making this change. I can either loose support for a version that is tested and working fine -- support, incidentally that I have already paid for through July 2004 -- or I can scramble to make sure that all my apps will work on this new version before support is lost AND THEN pay almost 6 times the price for the same level of support.

I agree with your comments about Slackware and Debian (both of which I have used). Selling a move to either of those would be difficult at best when talking to the "suits."

RH is in business to make money. That's all well and good, and I do not have a problem with the decision they have made. I just don't like the way they have decided to implement that decision. It would be much more responsible of them to continue update and maintenance throughout the life of their existing support contracts, and sell no more of them for the "end of life products." It would take them an additional 6 months or so to implement their change-over, but would give their most loyal customers (those who have paid without being required to) the time to evaluate their alternatives, test replacements, and (most critically for me) identify budget sources. It is this unwillingness to honor their agreements (ie the update & support already purchased) that has made me decide to move away from RH.

LordMorgul 11/09/03 10:56:31 AM EST

Plenty of inaccuracies to read here. I suggest anyone who is interested in understanding the move RedHat made go and read about it from RedHat as opposed to this poorly (and quite biased review + comments by people who don't know what they are talking about).

Yes, that was intended to be pointed. The idea that Fedora will be any less "supported" than RedHat 9 without paid support is incorrect, and poorly argued. If you subscribed to supported RedHat 9 before you simply need to move to RHEL now. And you can upgrade from 9 just fine, you're reading into something too much.

RedHat 9 had no more support than Fedora for new bugfixes. Each release will be supported for 6 - 8 months of backported bugfixes, as clearly stated on the Fedora website (but may have longer community support through fedora.us, which currently plans to support RH9 similarly)

If you need longer support timeframes, then you should be moving to RHEL, or another distro. (this slackware / debian talk is hilarious.. you intend to find "production environment" support there? Good luck kernel hacker gurus, you'll be needing your skills to keep many production machines running on a pure linux like that.)

Sea Dragon 11/09/03 01:57:27 AM EST

But I find some docs from Fedora in the bellowing :
Anyone is free at any time to fork this project, to go off and build their own distribution based on Fedora Core, just as many people have built distributions based on Red Hat Linux in the past. For Red Hat to participate in this project, Red Hat's own goals have to be met by the project. This doesn't mean that other goals cannot be met as well (except where they explicitly conflict with Red Hat's own critical goals), but the goals that Red Hat expresses define our "contract" with developers and users of Fedora Core.

Sea Dragon 11/09/03 01:56:34 AM EST

Anyone is free at any time to fork this project, to go off and build their own distribution based on Fedora Core, just as many people have built distributions based on Red Hat Linux in the past. For Red Hat to participate in this project, Red Hat's own goals have to be met by the project. This doesn't mean that other goals cannot be met as well (except where they explicitly conflict with Red Hat's own critical goals), but the goals that Red Hat expresses define our "contract" with developers and users of Fedora Core.

Sea Dragon 11/09/03 01:54:39 AM EST

Is something different? Are RH really want to own Linux without Kernel? Can they do that? Why "Fedora Core" will allow outside people to distribute "Fedora Core"? "Fedora Core" make something wrong????

What's happen? Can discuss?

Life is fun and Happy and no angry.


Sea Dragon 11/09/03 01:54:10 AM EST

"RedHat is trying to treat an Open Source OS as if they were the ones who created it and that they have been in control of the source code all along (i.e Microsoft, Solaris)"

But I find some docs from Fedora in the bellowing :

Phil 11/09/03 01:14:32 AM EST

WOW! Am I glad I switched from decaf (RedHat) to regular (SuSE) when I did... Ever since RedHat announced that they were going public on Wall Street, I then realized that they were no longer about Open Source, but about PROFIT!

Don't get me wrong, I'm all for making a profit, but the path that they are taking seems to be a path of self-destruction.

The one thing that seems to have been forgotten is why Linux was created in the fisrt place. Re-read the initial post that a guy by the name of Linus Torvalds made several years ago when he initially RELEASED Linux to the general public for FREE... You do remember Mr. Torvalds, don't you, or have you forgotten?

I originally started using Slackware when Linux was barely at Kernel 1.2; At that time I was completely amazed that I was able to purchase an entire UNIX-like OS with plenty of extras for under thirty bucks... and I'm still amazed that I can buy SuSE 9.0 professional with all of its extensive packages for 1/3 the price of Windows XP Professional... not to mention the fact that I don't need a license key to use it.

My point is that RedHat is trying to treat an Open Source OS as if they were the ones who created it and that they have been in control of the source code all along (i.e Microsoft, Solaris)

I could go on-and-on, but I think I said all I need to say. It is not my intention to offend anyone, all I am trying to do is provide my own opinion. Last time I checked, I still live in the FREE world. Let's keep it that way!

bill 11/06/03 06:18:13 PM EST

You know, in all the years I've been running RedHat, I've never had a significant "rpm dependency issue."

I have, however, had to re-write apps to work on the archaic versions of software used by the "woody" Debian distros. I assure you that took much more time than typing "up2date packagename" to solve a dependency issue.

However... I guess I didn't make my point very clearly. The problem I have is not that RedHat is changing the way they are doing business. Their choice, and I think it is a reasonable one. What I do have a problem with is them taking my money for 1 years worth of support, reniging on the contract and offering no compensation other than a "free upgrade" to a product that I cannot afford to maintain after the free period, and therefore will not be using.

That is the problem I have with RedHat -- the business practice, not the business model.

Aron Trauring 11/06/03 03:46:06 PM EST

I don't really see what the fuss is about. We switched to Debian years ago for both desktop and server machines. If you want
* easy maintainability,
* the ability to choose your level of stability and risk aversion versus bleeding edge,
* no rpm dependency issues,
* multi-hardware platform consistency,
* access to the widest range of FOSS apps,
then Debian is the way to go.

As for the licensing/support issue: How many of you who paid Red hat over the years actually called them up for tech support, how good was it and how often did you do that? Did you think your payments were getting the bug fixes done or did ever occur to you it was the community model? The idea that having a company behind it means it is commercial grade is just so much BS. Debian is not a corporation but a community and manages to support a far greater range of software options than Redhat while providing a superior product. Licensing fees may give you peace of mind but they are thrown out money.

If you are the kind of company that needs a license to cover your ass, then sure, go ahead, pay Red Hat or Novell. But if you can't afford to throw out money, then stop whining and install Debian. You'll actually be getting a superior product and saving money. It's seems a no-brainer to me.

If you need good support, Google and Safari should cover 90% of your needs. For the 5% where they aren't adequate, hire outsourced help on as needed basis. There are plenty of local contractors as well as national entreprises that can provide you hands-on support for all FOSS products, and not jsut GNU/Linux, when you need them.

Paul Nowak 11/05/03 06:10:07 PM EST

Bill, my thoughts exactly. I am running RH 7.3 on most of my servers and it is a fine solution. No need to upgrade to 8.0 or 9 yet (I actually was probably going to skip to 10 had it come out) and with this Red Hat change of policy, I now need to replace that plan with a new one. It's not really a problem -- the evaluation process will be the same as it was before. The only difference is Red Hat is off the list of contenders.


bill 11/05/03 04:54:09 PM EST

To maintain the same level of service I currently have with RedHat would require a 583% increase in spending. On top of that, they are not refunding the more than 6 months of service I've already paid for (on almost a dozen servers), but will not be receiving.

As for fedora, if I cannot get support for it, I cannot justify it in a production environment.

They've lost this customer -- not because they are changing the way they do business, but because of the way they are doing so -- cutting me off, leaving me out to dry.

We'll be staying with 7.3 as long as it is practical for me to do so (which for the web and db servers will likely be quite a while). Now where did I put that phone number for SuSE....

Joe 11/05/03 04:07:23 PM EST

Oh Well:

I wonder if Red Hat is commiting suicide as a company by forcing everyone to buy the product or go hang. Yeah, I know that I can go to other Linux distributions, but Red Hat had the easiest to implement if you had limited time and resources.

Personally if I have to plunk down my cash, it isnt going to be with a company that so obviously hangs out an entire class of its user base to dry. It's SUSE for me.

Bye Bye Red Hat....

ken blodget 11/05/03 01:07:54 PM EST

I read another media blurb on Red Hat's decision and they
noted that Red Hat was now recommending Windows for desktop
users. Why wasn't that mentioned in this article?

dragon 11/04/03 08:26:01 PM EST

I've made the switch to debian on all but two of my servers (they come this month), much better than redhat. More timely security updates, no rpm dependency issues, and when a new version comes out it's just one command to update the whole distro while live. It was a little bit of pain to learn at first but but the knowledge was well worth it. And with the social contract they have you don't have to ever worry about a change in the bussiness model. I thank redhat for pushing me to debian.

Jim 11/04/03 02:11:43 PM EST

You say that Fedora is not a stable product, so you will not be using it. If you want stable, what is wrong with 7, 8 and 9? I thought part of the beauty of Linux was you didn't have to upgrade if you didn't want to.

Sea Dragon 11/04/03 12:13:26 PM EST

Well. It is not easy to overcome when users get loss from RedHat. Big hard feeling. But when I go back to my past experience from using Linux, I found that there are no big difference in between RedHat & SUSE & some other Chinese Linux. Some Linux version has more general that include everything and some version not. But when I look into those Linux, I found that it is ok for me to do my work.
Of course now, RedHat Linux do the good job in auto-updated from RedHat network. Well, I still find some Local Distrributor has same concept (auto-updated). I like it.
Linux is so popular today and so easy to find the support engine in the market. If I am no money, I can go through to Local Linux support news group. There are too many expert in there. Such as in Hong Kong, I find news.linux.org.hk. This is Linux news group in www.linux.org.hk. I got some expert support in there. It is free. Also, it is so many Linux expert in the world. Just go to www.google.com and key in the key word, then too many solution in there.

Of course, if have money, I can find good expert in Local market, such as HP, IBM... They really want to help me to solve the problem and earn my money.

Anyway, it is not end of the world. It still have many many way to find the support except from RedHat.

Redhat is a company. I think it is not easy to maintain because I can free download from ftp.Redhat.com in the past five years. I alwasy thinks that how they get money to pay their staff and maintain the whole company. Also, Redhat contribute many many effort to Linux and make Linux become important in the Market. Well it is not easy. I see some Linux distributor's company cannot be maintained in the past. Happy to know that RedHat can earn money now. I am afraid Redhat cannot get enough money to support itself in past. It means that now Redhat can have more power to sponsor more and more other Linux development.

Although they give up some area and jump into some profit area. Well, in the later on, we can more powerful Linux. That is not dream and it is realistic.

Now, just think how to find the support in the market (may be go through Linux news group), they really want to help you. Otherwise, just change the distributor (too many in the world). All of them, really want to help you.

Hope you get help.

Matt Ingram 11/04/03 11:07:23 AM EST

We own a small web application developement company and all of our servers are RedHat 9. Right now we cannot afford to move to the Enterprise versions of RedHat. RedHat tells me that I cannot upgrade from 9, I have to do a clean install. I might as well change distros.

I have 6 months to decide which way we are going to go, but it's going to take us 6 months to update all the servers. I need a plan yesterday.

We are looking at many other options. Mandrake, Suse (Now Novell) and FreeBSD.

Jim Anderson 11/04/03 07:09:42 AM EST

RH9 is the underlying OS for K12LTSP (a Linux terminal server for K-12 education). This provided a low cost solution for schools short on budget and long on old PCs, which are used as diskless terminals. This might be a good business move for RH, but what about the schools that bought into the terminal server concept because it was supported (though not originated) by RH? Fortunately the latest beta version of LTSP can be integrated into any Linux distro and I'm sure the K12LTSP people could make the move to another underlying distro. Still, it's hard if you're short on resources and trying to build on what you thought would be a stable product, market-wise. Since I'm looking for a product that schools can get manufacturer support for, integrates with other desktop and networking components I'm looking at, and does not have an "enterprise" price I just ordered SuSE 9 Pro. I guess my development will take on a European flavor... no more all-night Coca-Cola, it'll be capuccino now.

Nils Valentin 11/04/03 02:45:54 AM EST

Hi Joel,

I hope you dont mean me with Red Hat hater ;-) . Dont get me wrong Red Hat was not bad some time ago. But recently I dont have the impression that they are innovative and supportive towards the open source community and the Linux products. As Steve already commented, its hard to see any effort made by Red Hat. I know that Mandrakes developers must be really working hard. If you followed the Mandrake versions than it is obvious how well the product increased user friendlyness (something were Suse still has to learn). I believe Suse is especially good for the Desktop marcet as it comes with a huge list of software pakets and I know that they already compiled the new KDE3.2 (beta1) which is luying in their FTP servers and tested thoroughly. Almost every 3 days they compile the next KDE version to get out the little insects ;-).
How do I know this ? Its simple I download it and install it ;-).
I would go so far and say, that by now there is almost no application which doesnt exist under Linux. The point is you have to know on which ftp server it is ;-).

Nils Valentin 11/04/03 02:44:36 AM EST

Hi Joel,

I hope you dont mean me with Red Hat hater ;-) . Dont get me wrong Red Hat was not bad some time ago. But recently I dont have the impression that they are innovative and supportive towards the open source community and the Linux products. As Steve already commented, its hard to see any effort made by Red Hat. I know that Mandrakes developers must be really working hard. If you followed the mandrake versions than it is obvious how ell the product increased user friendlyness (something were Suse still has to learn). I believe Suse is especially good for the Desktop marcet as it comes with a huge list of software pakets and I know that they already compiled the new KDE3.2 (beta1) which is luying in their FTP servers and tested thoroughly. Almost every 3 days they compile the next KDE version to get out the little insects ;-).
How do I know this ? Its simple I download it and install it ;-).
I would go so far and say, that by now there is almost no application which doesnt exist under Linux. The point is you have to know on which ftp server it is ;-).

joel 11/04/03 02:29:45 AM EST

It's funny to see all the redhat haters come out of the woodwork and vent their spleen over this - LOL! I've tried a lot of other distros, and redhat has been the best for me over the years. I really like what I've seen of fedora, so unlike some of the silly ideas I heard in this forum, I'm going to take a look at it and see how it runs. Personally I think the idea of throwing a tantrum and moving to debian or slackware is cutting off one's nose to spite one's face.

Steve Wolfe 11/04/03 02:24:13 AM EST

I would agree that Red Hat seems to have drawn a line in the sand. To either buy the Enterprise versions or to switch to someone else's distro.

Considering the infrastructure that Red Hat already has in place, it is not difficult for them to merge fixes into their system. Remember for most of these fixes, Red Hat is NOT coding the fix themselves.

Nor do I see a commmitment from Red Hat to fix something if it is broken, and I have looked really hard.

If Red Hat is going to play in this space, I would expect a work around within hours and a guarenteed code fix within 1 month or less.

How can they do that, when they have had a seg fault in rpm since Red Hat 8 that exists to this day?

I would have more sympathy for them if they were doing more of their own fixes, but they are not.

And it is disapointing that Red Hat in order to advance their 'enterprise' product apparently is not offering this service at any price to any customers. This short window is doing its existing enterprise customers a grave disservice. Even though Red Hat might think these customers are useless.

You think an enterprise customer can move off of existing Red Hat by Jan 2004? [sometimes they can, but they will NOT like it]

So, I have read Red Hat's site extensively and I am not impressed with the value that the Enterprise version brings. Again, this is something that remains to be seen.

I would hope that Mandrake and SuSE will still have a version with a book that matches a freely downloadable or copyable distribution.

And I would think that a company could make money at this and not insist on a licence per machine, as in the microsoft model. Red Hat spends a staggering amount of money that is difficult to account.

When I read what Red Hat officially said about fedora, I wrote it off. Only time will tell if fedora will be worth anything.

For now, I am looking for another distribution. SuSE, Mandrake, Debian come to mind. Perhaps Gentoo. farther along, perhaps FreeBSD.

Nils Valentin 11/04/03 01:02:01 AM EST

I have used Suse, Mandrake and Red Hat on an everyday basis at work and I must say that personally prefer Suse Linux with a long distance to the second (Mandrake).

My impression is that Red Hat Linux is over all a bit outdated, compared to the other competitors.

Nevertheless its pitty to loose the variaty of the Linux Distributions.

Robert 11/03/03 11:51:01 PM EST

This is the business only. Nothing personal….
I have never positioned myself as Linux user.
I used it just because I had to.
My heart is with FreeBSD and I see my perception does not lie to me.
I see - Red Hat's decision is just proving the situation.
I believe from now FreeBSD will grow faster – almost all community will migrate on it.

Jeff Spellman 11/03/03 10:37:56 PM EST

I admit, I'm disappointed by RedHat's decision. But, they are publicly traded after all. That means ROI to investors. Although I run a hobby site, I'd like to think my derived knowledge will be usable in my career. You know, like fun and usefull too, what a concept! So, Fedora is out. FreeBSD is mature, and used in commercial environments. Debian would be my second choice.

Michael Rasmussen 11/03/03 09:48:37 PM EST

Progengy just announced a port of the RedHat Anaconda installer to Debian. The strength of that installer with the pleasure of apt-get (and aptitude) for system maintenance will address your objections to using Debian.

Carl Linkletter 11/03/03 09:46:17 PM EST

I find it interesting that you mention three alternative Linux versions but not SuSE, especially in the light that IBM and Sun have endorsed it as their Linux desktop of choice.

Fedora 11/03/03 09:39:22 PM EST

Don't write Fedora off yet. The first offical release of Fedora will be available soon. Let's wait and see.

Jay Lee 11/03/03 09:09:35 PM EST

I strongly disagree, I do not believe this is a marketing move. It is a business move. (Think about it, there is a difference) RedHat is a business. They're out to make money, that is their goal, don't like it? Move to China. Business is what motivates them, but they also have beliefs which they will not compromise just for more business. RedHat Enterprise Linux (RHEL) was making money RedHat Linux (RHL) was not. RedHat realized this and chose to spin RHL off into a community project. The project is hosted and developed by many RedHat employees (see http://fedora.redhat.com/about/leadership.html for reference) I have a lot of faith in RedHat, they have been a strong force for Open Source and Linux for a long time. They have never compromised their beliefs and if they can make money off of that, then good for them. How can you possibly argue that Fedora will be a unstable testbed when you haven't even tried it yet? Right now, all we have to go on is RedHat's word, which is good in my book and time will tell all.

IoT & Smart Cities Stories
All in Mobile is a place where we continually maximize their impact by fostering understanding, empathy, insights, creativity and joy. They believe that a truly useful and desirable mobile app doesn't need the brightest idea or the most advanced technology. A great product begins with understanding people. It's easy to think that customers will love your app, but can you justify it? They make sure your final app is something that users truly want and need. The only way to do this is by ...
Digital Transformation and Disruption, Amazon Style - What You Can Learn. Chris Kocher is a co-founder of Grey Heron, a management and strategic marketing consulting firm. He has 25+ years in both strategic and hands-on operating experience helping executives and investors build revenues and shareholder value. He has consulted with over 130 companies on innovating with new business models, product strategies and monetization. Chris has held management positions at HP and Symantec in addition to ...
Dynatrace is an application performance management software company with products for the information technology departments and digital business owners of medium and large businesses. Building the Future of Monitoring with Artificial Intelligence. Today we can collect lots and lots of performance data. We build beautiful dashboards and even have fancy query languages to access and transform the data. Still performance data is a secret language only a couple of people understand. The more busine...
The challenges of aggregating data from consumer-oriented devices, such as wearable technologies and smart thermostats, are fairly well-understood. However, there are a new set of challenges for IoT devices that generate megabytes or gigabytes of data per second. Certainly, the infrastructure will have to change, as those volumes of data will likely overwhelm the available bandwidth for aggregating the data into a central repository. Ochandarena discusses a whole new way to think about your next...
CloudEXPO | DevOpsSUMMIT | DXWorldEXPO are the world's most influential, independent events where Cloud Computing was coined and where technology buyers and vendors meet to experience and discuss the big picture of Digital Transformation and all of the strategies, tactics, and tools they need to realize their goals. Sponsors of DXWorldEXPO | CloudEXPO benefit from unmatched branding, profile building and lead generation opportunities.
DXWorldEXPO LLC announced today that Big Data Federation to Exhibit at the 22nd International CloudEXPO, colocated with DevOpsSUMMIT and DXWorldEXPO, November 12-13, 2018 in New York City. Big Data Federation, Inc. develops and applies artificial intelligence to predict financial and economic events that matter. The company uncovers patterns and precise drivers of performance and outcomes with the aid of machine-learning algorithms, big data, and fundamental analysis. Their products are deployed...
Cell networks have the advantage of long-range communications, reaching an estimated 90% of the world. But cell networks such as 2G, 3G and LTE consume lots of power and were designed for connecting people. They are not optimized for low- or battery-powered devices or for IoT applications with infrequently transmitted data. Cell IoT modules that support narrow-band IoT and 4G cell networks will enable cell connectivity, device management, and app enablement for low-power wide-area network IoT. B...
The hierarchical architecture that distributes "compute" within the network specially at the edge can enable new services by harnessing emerging technologies. But Edge-Compute comes at increased cost that needs to be managed and potentially augmented by creative architecture solutions as there will always a catching-up with the capacity demands. Processing power in smartphones has enhanced YoY and there is increasingly spare compute capacity that can be potentially pooled. Uber has successfully ...
SYS-CON Events announced today that CrowdReviews.com has been named “Media Sponsor” of SYS-CON's 22nd International Cloud Expo, which will take place on June 5–7, 2018, at the Javits Center in New York City, NY. CrowdReviews.com is a transparent online platform for determining which products and services are the best based on the opinion of the crowd. The crowd consists of Internet users that have experienced products and services first-hand and have an interest in letting other potential buye...
When talking IoT we often focus on the devices, the sensors, the hardware itself. The new smart appliances, the new smart or self-driving cars (which are amalgamations of many ‘things'). When we are looking at the world of IoT, we should take a step back, look at the big picture. What value are these devices providing. IoT is not about the devices, its about the data consumed and generated. The devices are tools, mechanisms, conduits. This paper discusses the considerations when dealing with the...